Titlebook: Defining International Terrorism; Between State Sovere Stella Margariti Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

使入迷

2352-6718 l law in particular.Clarifies the relevance of State soverei.This book is an attempt to approach the issue of defining international terrorism, proposing that the most workable way to do so is to achieve due balance between the two principal driving forces of international law developments: State so

frenzy

Book 2017s Resolution 1368 and Resolution 1373..The volume broadens the reader’s understanding on how State sovereignty interests and priorities as well as ideals of cosmopolitanism have influenced the development of international law in general and international criminal law in particular. Furthermore, it s

Entrancing

Introduction,international criminal justice. While there are imperative reasons to allow international criminal justice to play its role in the fight against terrorism, States have been so far strongly opposed to this idea. The reasons for this wary attitude of States should be mainly sought to the potential imp

Original

State Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism and the International Criminal Court,vereignty in the context of the UN Charter and the Rome Statute frameworks, focusing on the regime of complementarity enshrined in the latter and contributing thus to our understanding of the differentiated approaches that the Security Council and the ICC follow on issues that touch upon State sover

GREEN

The Paradigm of Aggression: State-Centric and Cosmopolitan Approaches in the Effort to Outlaw and Cng, criminalising and defining aggression, from the League of Nations period until its inclusion in the Rome Statute and the formulation of the definition of the crime of aggression in the Review Conference held in Kampala in 2010. The driving forces that shaped this development are manifest in the

charisma

印第安人

The Paradigm of Terrorism: State-Centric and Cosmopolitan Approaches in Some Current Efforts Toward the attack of 9/11, prioritising thus State sovereignty interests over cosmopolitan purposes, whereas the Special Tribunal of Lebanon (STL) issued a quite bold pro-cosmopolitan decision that a customary law definition for terrorism exists, at least in time of peace. The General Assembly (GA) effort

袋鼠

sultry

Conclusion,need to finally agree upon a universal definition for terrorism but also that this definition should be more than a compromise between those who aspire to cosmopolitan ideas and those who prioritise State concerns over those ideas. The formulation of an international definition for terrorism, if eve

暂时别动