找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review; Comparative Perspect Guobin Zhu Conference proceedings 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland

[复制链接]
查看: 20423|回复: 61
发表于 2025-3-21 20:06:30 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review
副标题Comparative Perspect
编辑Guobin Zhu
视频video
概述Represents the first systematic and comparative study of judicial deference.Empirically investigates a country-based system.Offers a combination of theory and national practice
丛书名称Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law
图书封面Titlebook: Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review; Comparative Perspect Guobin Zhu Conference proceedings 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland
描述.This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for..Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law..
出版日期Conference proceedings 2019
关键词Judicial deference to the administration in judicial review; Judicial review of administrative action
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9
isbn_softcover978-3-030-31541-2
isbn_ebook978-3-030-31539-9Series ISSN 2214-6881 Series E-ISSN 2214-689X
issn_series 2214-6881
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review网络公开度




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review被引频次




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review被引频次学科排名




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review年度引用




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review年度引用学科排名




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review读者反馈




书目名称Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:09:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:18:57 | 显示全部楼层
as Psychological Fiction (1959), The analysis of the national reports reveals why, how and when the courts defer to administrative actions..In each constitutional system, deference is employed differently as the positioning of the judiciary within the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balanc
发表于 2025-3-22 07:45:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:50:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:48:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:39:22 | 显示全部楼层
‘Cartloads of Books’: some Sources for te even more gaps which have to be filled by the courts. In the Czech Republic relative ease of judicial review by the courts of first instance and the wide open access to the Supreme Administrative Court mean that many administrative cases are resolved in four instances—two instances of administrat
发表于 2025-3-23 00:35:12 | 显示全部楼层
The Idea of Childhood: A GenealogyEuropean Union (EU) administration. The analysis shows that the review of the European courts on the discretionary choices of the EU administration revolves around the concept of ‘manifest error’. This term has acquired a different meaning throughout time, evolving from a very light review towards a
发表于 2025-3-23 04:13:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:52:27 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35086-8is, I present an overview of reliance on deference “stricto sensu” in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court when deciding on challenges to administrative action. Using textual analysis, it is shown that very few decisions consider the doctrine as such as the basis of the rejection of an application
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 11:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表