书目名称 | Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review | 副标题 | Comparative Perspect | 编辑 | Guobin Zhu | 视频video | | 概述 | Represents the first systematic and comparative study of judicial deference.Empirically investigates a country-based system.Offers a combination of theory and national practice | 丛书名称 | Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law | 图书封面 |  | 描述 | .This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for..Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.. | 出版日期 | Conference proceedings 2019 | 关键词 | Judicial deference to the administration in judicial review; Judicial review of administrative action | 版次 | 1 | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9 | isbn_softcover | 978-3-030-31541-2 | isbn_ebook | 978-3-030-31539-9Series ISSN 2214-6881 Series E-ISSN 2214-689X | issn_series | 2214-6881 | copyright | Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|