Titlebook: Decision Making in Criminal Justice; Toward the Rational Michael R. Gottfredson,Don M. Gottfredson Book 1988 Springer Science+Business Med

ciliary-body

Centenarian Transhumanism Aging in Placelso involve debates about the extent of discretion that ought to be allowed judges in choosing alternative sentences. In this chapter we seek to summarize these trends, to speculate about their potential implications for rationality in decision making, and to identify some of the research challenges that they present.

吸气

ALERT

教唆

人造

fundamental aspects of criminal jus­ tice. These decisions are not always highly visible. They are made, or­ dinarily, within wide areas of discretion. The aims of the decisions are not always clear, and, indeed, the principal objectives of these decisions are often the subject of much debate. Usual

打折

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0409-4pter we will review selected empirical studies bearing on this important decision; investigate the goals, information, and alternatives pertaining to the decision; and assess how what is learned bears on the requirements of rationality.

opalescence

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0409-4 small task, for no single aspect of police work has received more scholarly attention recently than has the decision to arrest. Our review must therefore be selective, including only the most informative studies and commentaries.

晚来的提名

Inscrutable

AFFIX

The Decision to Arrest, small task, for no single aspect of police work has received more scholarly attention recently than has the decision to arrest. Our review must therefore be selective, including only the most informative studies and commentaries.