Titlebook: Debating Nature‘s Value; The Concept of ‘Natu Victor Anderson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Natural Capita

使入伍

书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value网络公开度




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value被引频次




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value被引频次学科排名




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value年度引用




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value年度引用学科排名




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value读者反馈




书目名称Debating Nature‘s Value读者反馈学科排名

扩张

legislate

Armory

Paraplegia

,Is the Concept of ‘Natural Capital’ Useful?,d pitfalls of a ‘natural capital’ approach to ensure that a sensible trajectory is being pursued. Outlined in this chapter are some recommendations for a nuanced approach to the conceptualisation of ‘natural capital’ which takes into account the benefits and potential risks.

laceration

How Should We Value Nature?,rotected if we can assess it in monetary terms. This seems appealing—nature has been undervalued for too long. But there are risks and flaws in the Natural Capital approach—the way we experience nature or the simple right of nature to exist cannot be measured in this way. And putting a monetary valu

laceration

蘑菇

Gudgeon

deforestation

,‘Natural Capital’: Ontology or Analogy?,he concept of ‘Natural Capital’ will then be provided, a key reference point being the ‘Five Capitals’ approach in Jonathon Porrit’s 2005 book. I will suggest that what we have in the Five Capitals approach is a series of analogies conceived as a piece of social marketing of sustainability, primaril