找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Debating Development Discourse; Institutional and Po David B. Moore (Lecturer in Politics),Gerald J. Sc Book 1995 Palgrave Macmillan, a div

[复制链接]
查看: 8063|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 19:06:31 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Debating Development Discourse
副标题Institutional and Po
编辑David B. Moore (Lecturer in Politics),Gerald J. Sc
视频video
丛书名称International Political Economy Series
图书封面Titlebook: Debating Development Discourse; Institutional and Po David B. Moore (Lecturer in Politics),Gerald J. Sc Book 1995 Palgrave Macmillan, a div
描述This book combines critical historical analysis and case studies of the theory and practice of post-1945 international development. Beginning with a Gramscian analysis of institutional and academic development discourse, continuing with critiques of international institutions‘ current neo-liberal economic and ‘governance‘ practices, and followed by studies of African moral opposition to structural adjustment‘s ‘scientific capitalism‘, South African housing struggles, Zimbabwean development strategies, Costa Rican agrarian NGO‘s, and northern Albertan public environmental hearings, it advocates deepening radical and popular participatory democracy.
出版日期Book 1995
关键词democracy; democratization; development; Governance; hegemony
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24199-6
isbn_softcover978-1-349-24201-6
isbn_ebook978-1-349-24199-6Series ISSN 2662-2483 Series E-ISSN 2662-2491
issn_series 2662-2483
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1995
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Debating Development Discourse影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Debating Development Discourse影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Debating Development Discourse网络公开度




书目名称Debating Development Discourse网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Debating Development Discourse被引频次




书目名称Debating Development Discourse被引频次学科排名




书目名称Debating Development Discourse年度引用




书目名称Debating Development Discourse年度引用学科排名




书目名称Debating Development Discourse读者反馈




书目名称Debating Development Discourse读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:14:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:09:14 | 显示全部楼层
Participation: Local versus Expert Knowledge at the Environmental Public Hearings for a Pulp Mill it explores the merits and shortcomings of public participation during these environmental impact hearings with an emphasis upon how members of the public contested the professional hegemony of state managers and confronted the ‘expertocracy’ of specialists hired to review the pulp mill’s impacts.
发表于 2025-3-22 06:06:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:44:30 | 显示全部楼层
978-1-349-24201-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1995
发表于 2025-3-22 13:42:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:43:59 | 显示全部楼层
Klaus-Stephan Otto,Thomas Speck there is much less confidence, on the part of either governments (despite their slogans of ‘managing change’) or the governed (still more herded than heeded), that matters can be controlled (effectively and democratically?) to achieve the public purposes ritually promised by political rhetoric.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:37:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:49:57 | 显示全部楼层
Systemisch-evolutionäres Management goods were skyrocketing, employment declining, and real incomes rapidly shrinking. Many wondered how they would manage to make ends meet. Many, indeed, were failing to make ends meet: with high food prices, many went hungry; with free medical care abolished, many sick could not receive treatment. F
发表于 2025-3-23 07:18:01 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-23 01:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表