Titlebook: Debating Collaboration and Complicity in War Crimes Trials in Asia, 1945-1956; Kerstin von Lingen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

mortuary

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36255-2he roots of law and the idea of war responsibility in East Asia that fed into this postwar push toward the use of war crimes trials to resolve postimperial conflicts. What ideology underpinned the pursuit of justice in China and Japan and how did this movement react to the political forces at the ti

thwart

Fretful

Dark Tourism in the American West life, and collaboration, which actively assisted the enemy, was nowhere clear or certain. Second, the timing of an atrocity was crucial in whether it could be considered a war crime; also crucial was the nationality of perpetrators and victims. In the end, these limits led to profound dissatisfacti

INCH

Precursor

结果

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36255-2such action? This chapter will illuminate these issues and focus on early postwar Japanese attempts to shape the postwar conversation about justice in a manner that suited wartime military goals and civilian aims.

兽群

slow-wave-sleep

Koreans in the Trials of Japanese War Crimes Suspects,penalties, are wrong. The records relating to Koreans indicate that prosecution, and subsequent deliberations over sentencing and clemency, took strong account of the implications of having a subordinate place in the Japanese military. Far from being the group upon whom the greatest punishment was v

Jargon

,Puppets, Profiteers and Traitors: Defining Wartime Collaboration in the Dutch East Indies, 1945–194nt stand on punishing collaborators, but without completely abandoning prosecution for collaboration. On the one hand, definitions and categories of collaboration were narrowed to prevent all Indonesians from being prosecuted for having nationalist feelings and to prevent population groups from alie

对手

,The Question of Complicity: Japan’s Early Postures toward War Crimes and War Responsibility in the such action? This chapter will illuminate these issues and focus on early postwar Japanese attempts to shape the postwar conversation about justice in a manner that suited wartime military goals and civilian aims.