找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Debates on Colonial Genocide in the 21st Century; Marouf‘Hasian Jr. Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[复制链接]
楼主: 街道
发表于 2025-3-23 11:40:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:21:49 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2020rsations about apologies and other restorative justice acts. This work will be of interest to a wide range of audiences including researchers, scholars, graduate students, and policy makers in the fields of political history, genocide studies, and political science. .
发表于 2025-3-23 19:39:02 | 显示全部楼层
Remembering and Forgetting the Tasmanian Genocide,e adamant that it is not the exact numbers who die that determines whether certain colonial acts constitute a genocide. The chapter puts on display evidence from public and academic sources to show that further debate is needed about the attempted “extirpation” of the Tasmanians.
发表于 2025-3-23 23:05:09 | 显示全部楼层
The Indigeneity Wars: Academic and Public Refusals to Recognize Al-Nakba,at some type of ethnic cleansing had taken place during the 1948 expulsions. Using the work of writers such as Ilan Pappé and Benny Morris as touchstones, the author puts on display the varied academic, legal, political, and military reasons why so few want to include the Nakba in the traditional canons of genocidal studies.
发表于 2025-3-24 03:51:29 | 显示全部楼层
,Opening Up the “Pandora’s Box” That Comes with Academic, Legal, and Public Acknowledgments of “Coloognized this might lead to litigation like the British settlements with former Mau Mau fighters. The author argues that these expressed anxieties do not provide sufficient warrants for closing off needed debates about colonial genocides or restorative justice for indigenous survivors.
发表于 2025-3-24 10:16:08 | 显示全部楼层
Figuration in Shelley and Dantestudies of “modern” genocides. The author contends that twenty-first-century scholars and public care very deeply about apologies, expressions of regret, the repatriation of remains, and reparations for colonial wrongdoing, and that we need more nuanced “decolonizing” debates about these topics. Thi
发表于 2025-3-24 14:06:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 17:27:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 20:55:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 23:39:08 | 显示全部楼层
Marouf‘Hasian Jr.Provides a detailed critical analysis of some of academic and journalistic debates on colonial genocide.Analyzes two major cases studies of genocide, the Tasmanian genocide and the Nakba.Presents the
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-8 01:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表