Titlebook: Data Privacy Management, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology; ESORICS 2022 Interna Joaquin Garcia-Alfaro,Guillermo Navarro-Arribas,N

返老还童

坦白

恃强凌弱的人

The Ticket Price Matters in Sharding Blockchainlyze the trade-off between security and scalability. Moreover, we conduct a numerical analysis by capturing four real-world resource distributions from renowned permissionless cryptocurrency networks. We re-evaluate the well-known sharding protocols through this numerical analysis and present the ch

外向者

LightSwap: An Atomic Swap Does Not Require Timeouts at both Blockchainsock puzzles, a computationally expensive primitive that hinders its use in battery-constrained devices such as mobile phones. In this state of affairs, we question whether the 2-phase commit paradigm is necessary for atomic swaps in the first place. In other words, is it possible to design a secure

anniversary

STEER

以烟熏消毒

Community Engagement for Better Schoolsm and ham email classification model with local differential privacy, we find that setting a local threshold of F1-Score on the clients’ level can reduce the consumption of privacy budget over several rounds, and decrease the training time. Moreover, we find that for the central model a significantl

CRAFT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54038-8ose measures for fair privacy when applying LDP and show that the parameters on the randomized response matrix can be tuned to generate fairer-LDP mechanisms with the same global privacy guarantee .. We show the effectiveness of our approach through an experimental evaluation in Machine Learning Cla

伟大

Giorgia Cesaro,Giuseppe Delmonaconise that in some spaces (e.g., shared workplaces) occupants may feel uncomfortable disclosing their preferences if their anonymity is not respected due to the lack of transparency about who can control that data. Thus, this work focuses on a decentralised system based on the SITA privacy model to p

insurgent

Community Heritage in the Arab Regionrcial trackers on religious websites—e.g., 32% of religious websites and 78% of religious Android apps host Google trackers. Session replay services (., ., ., .) on 198 religious sites sent sensitive information to third parties. Religious sites (14) and apps (7) sent sensitive information in clear