Titlebook: D.H. Lawrence, Science and the Posthuman; Jeff Wallace Book 2005 Jeff Wallace 2005 David Herbert Lawrence.ideology.philosophy.British and

颂扬本人

Thinking Mattergress’ must be tempered, Bergson insists, by a recognition that something in the very nature of intellect as an . (rather than, for example, divinely ordained) entity places a necessary limitation on it. From this evolved condition,

narcissism

Explosive

旁观者

Book 2005uman‘ conceptions of a material kinship between humans, animals and machines can transform our understanding of Lawrence‘s work and of its complex relationship with scientific epistemologies. Through detailed readings of evolutionary philosophy, and of the ‘new Bergsonism‘ of Deleuze and others, Wal

MORPH

大漩涡

Adrija Bhattacharya,Sankhayan Choudhurythe mind that directs it’? The hand ‘flickers’ with a life of its own, and comes to learn and know things through touch. It slips along, jumps to dot an ., gets cold or bored — in fact, has its own ‘rudiments’ of thought. ‘Why should I imagine that there is a . which is more . than my hand is?’ (P 533)

致词

嘲笑

Book 2005ationship with scientific epistemologies. Through detailed readings of evolutionary philosophy, and of the ‘new Bergsonism‘ of Deleuze and others, Wallace provides a radical reappraisal of Lawrence in terms of an ‘antihumanist (or posthumanist) humanism‘ (Hardt and Negri).

褪色

Irrigate