找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand; An Alternative Frame Pierangelo Garegnani,Roberto Ciccone Book 2024 The Editor(

[复制链接]
楼主: intensify
发表于 2025-3-30 11:58:21 | 显示全部楼层
Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distributiontury ultimately rely, has been the object of considerable discussion in recent years. As is well known, these theories had their origin in a reformulation in terms of homogeneous land and “intensive” margins, of the Malthusian theory of rent.
发表于 2025-3-30 14:26:16 | 显示全部楼层
Switching of Techniques to a change in the rate of profits, to become profitable again when the profit rate changes further in the same direction. We first point out where Levhari’s argument fails and then show, by means of a numerical example, that such a ‘return’, or ‘switch-back’, of a production system is possible und
发表于 2025-3-30 17:51:48 | 显示全部楼层
On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution: A Comment on Samu of analysis centered on ‘long-run positions, characterized by auniform rate of profit, to short-run equilibria, which do not imply a uniform rate of return on the supply price of capital goods. It is argued that the explanation for this move towards short-period equilibria, their sequence over time
发表于 2025-3-30 23:51:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 03:43:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 05:35:05 | 显示全部楼层
Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marxeory of value which led Ricardo and Marx to rely on the quantities of labour ‘embodied’ in the commodities, in Marx integated by the introduction of the prices of production. The error Marx makes with regard to the latter is then traceable to the superimposition of two equivalent but distinct method
发表于 2025-3-31 10:20:54 | 显示全部楼层
Misunderstanding Classical Economics? A Reply to Blaugnterpretation pointing to the basic role of institutional and historical factors in the classical theory of distribution and capital accumulation is criticized as “amazingly narrow” (215), one that looks at those economists “‘through the lenses of the linear production model’” (234).
发表于 2025-3-31 13:26:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 20:42:34 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 15:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表