Titlebook: Critical Survey Of Studies On The Languages of Sumatra; P. Voorhoeve Book 1955 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1955 language.lis

有毛就脱毛

conifer

Typen, Unterschiede und Reformperspektivenrk is of importance, especially because of the many examples of sentences it contains. The treatment of the sound- system is insufficient because no use has been made of the results obtained in phonemics. Extensive textual material was collected locally by Kähler in 1938; one of these texts has been

absolve

NOMAD

breadth

Introduction,d grammar (2) deserve mention, because the material, in so far as it had not been taken from earlier publications, had been mainly collected in Sumatra. At present these works are only of historical importance; they were translated into Dutch and into French (3, 4) and so they have been used by all

Pamphlet

断断续续

Gayo,y find a considerable amount of grammatical and lexicographical material. His collected materials were worked over and considerably extended at Djakarta by Hazeu, with the help of two Gayö living there, Njaq Poetéh and Ama-n-Ratoes; the result was the Gayö-Dutch dictionary (34), which in spite of be

消散

CRASS

Malay and Minangkabau,y in the wider sense of the term. Brandes distinguished one part of these as Middle Malay, whilst on Esser’s linguistic map this part even occurs as a distinct language. To my mind this is, however, not a sharply defined group. Minangkabau, on the contrary, does possess a clearly apparent character

Vertical