找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Critical Praxis Research; Breathing New Life i Tricia M. Kress Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 CPR.critical pedagogy.cr

[复制链接]
查看: 21507|回复: 63
发表于 2025-3-21 18:34:36 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Critical Praxis Research
副标题Breathing New Life i
编辑Tricia M. Kress
视频video
概述Applies the tenets of critical pedagogy to research in a way that is both theoretical and practical.Provides students with a strong conceptual knowledge base about critical research in an engaging way
丛书名称Explorations of Educational Purpose
图书封面Titlebook: Critical Praxis Research; Breathing New Life i Tricia M. Kress Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 CPR.critical pedagogy.cr
描述Critical Praxis Research (CPR) is a teacher research methodology designed to bridge the divide between practitioner and scholar, drawing together many strands to explain the research process not just as something teacher researchers do, but as a fundamental part of who teacher researchers are. Emphasizing the researcher over the method, CPR embraces and amplifies the skills and passions teachers naturally bring to their research endeavours. Emerging from the tradition of critical pedagogy, Critical Praxis Research: Breathing New Life into Research Methods for Teachers transcends longstanding debates over quantitative vs. qualitative and scholar vs. practitioner research. The text examines the histories and current applications of common methodologies and re-conceptualizes the ways that these methodologies can be used to enhance teachers’ identities as practitioners and researchers. It also provides a critical examination of the role of Institutional Review Boards, and explores the complexity and ethics of data collection, data analysis, and writing. Through guiding questions and writing prompts, the author encourages readers to think through the process of design and conducting CPR
出版日期Book 2011
关键词CPR; critical pedagogy; critical praxis research; critical research; educational research; praxis researc
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1790-9
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3804-1
isbn_ebook978-94-007-1790-9Series ISSN 1875-4449 Series E-ISSN 1875-4457
issn_series 1875-4449
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Critical Praxis Research影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Critical Praxis Research影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Critical Praxis Research网络公开度




书目名称Critical Praxis Research网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Critical Praxis Research被引频次




书目名称Critical Praxis Research被引频次学科排名




书目名称Critical Praxis Research年度引用




书目名称Critical Praxis Research年度引用学科排名




书目名称Critical Praxis Research读者反馈




书目名称Critical Praxis Research读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:47:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:22:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:52:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:13:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:33:40 | 显示全部楼层
The Seven Deadly Sins: Vices and Virtues of CPRs the arrogance of the CPResearcher, the envy of the research endeavor, the indulgence of involving ourselves in the lived experiences of others, the assumption that CPR is a slothful practice, and the wrath of the CPResearcher. This troubling disturbs the binary of sin versus virtue. The chapter co
发表于 2025-3-22 19:29:38 | 显示全部楼层
The Art of CPR Research Designpter explains a variety of qualitative research methods (as these are the most common forms of Critical Praxis Research) and explains bricolage, a mixing of approaches that blurs research genre. The chapter also explores quantitative and mixed methodological approaches to research. Acknowledging the
发表于 2025-3-22 21:15:32 | 显示全部楼层
From Knowledge Discovery to Understandingpresentation for the CPResearcher. Throughout the discussion, the chapter emphasizes the CPResearcher as both a maker and interpreter of meaning, and demonstrates the possibilities of subjectivity. In CPR, data analysis includes, rather than marginalizes, the researcher; the researcher does not deny
发表于 2025-3-23 03:59:30 | 显示全部楼层
Demystifying Research Ethics in CPRical Praxis Research. Though she allows that some practitioner researchers see the IRB process as a foreboding troll hindering our work, she argues instead for an engagement with—and a furthering of—IRB ethics. For the author, the CPResearcher must meet and exceed basic ethical standards, even as th
发表于 2025-3-23 06:28:05 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-5 07:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表