Titlebook: Counting Populations, Understanding Societies; Towards a Interpreta Véronique Petit Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 20

忠诚

书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies网络公开度




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies被引频次




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies被引频次学科排名




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies年度引用




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies年度引用学科排名




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies读者反馈




书目名称Counting Populations, Understanding Societies读者反馈学科排名

Redundant

Epistemology in Demography and Anthropology,sed on a fundamental illusion, the dogma of figures and numbers. We both felt that it was self-evident that any approach claiming to be scientific needs to be explicit about its methodological choices and implicit presuppositions. In reality, it is clear that the extent to which the underlying assum

craving

The Contours of a Social Science, ‘most scientists agree that economics, social psychology and history may also be included’, while psychology, geography, demography, archaeology and linguistics can legitimately be incorporated based on a broad conception of the social sciences, since these disciplines ‘are partly natural sciences’

NICE

analogous

Some Unresolved Issues,rily based on a genuine understanding of anthropological research (Descola 1988). Almost 20 years later, Descola revisited the idea in a paper on the nature of anthropological knowledge, reiterating his initial assessment and concluding that claiming to practice anthropology is not a guarantee that

eardrum

eardrum

sed on a fundamental illusion, the dogma of figures and numbers. We both felt that it was self-evident that any approach claiming to be scientific needs to be explicit about its methodological choices and implicit presuppositions. In reality, it is clear that the extent to which the underlying assum

Communal

CURL

胆大

Literatur und Literaturwissenschaftrily based on a genuine understanding of anthropological research (Descola 1988). Almost 20 years later, Descola revisited the idea in a paper on the nature of anthropological knowledge, reiterating his initial assessment and concluding that claiming to practice anthropology is not a guarantee that