找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Counter-Modernism in Current Critical Theory; Geoffrey Thurley Book 1983 Geoffrey Thurley 1983 Dante Alighieri.drama.essay.Interpretation.

[复制链接]
楼主: Forestall
发表于 2025-3-26 21:39:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 01:43:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 06:05:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 12:23:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 13:52:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 18:13:13 | 显示全部楼层
The Problem of Art-Languages,gree of exactitude, we can also explicate the symbols of ordinary language. We can always use sense-data to elucidate the symbols of any rational discourse. Without some such elucidation, indeed, these symbols are likely to be condemned as meaningless. We can ‘say what we mean’ without just repeating our words.
发表于 2025-3-27 22:59:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 05:22:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 09:25:11 | 显示全部楼层
Was ist Röntgenstrahlung — wie entsteht sie?iptive criticism remains blind, opaque to its own workings. A proper criticism must take into account the structure of critical propositions in their relation to the artefacts they describe. Only by providing such an account can description transcend itself. For the propositions of criticism are emp
发表于 2025-3-28 12:35:15 | 显示全部楼层
Was ist los mit dem Treibhaus Erde. Yet there seems to be no way of effecting a successful analysis. We speak of the ‘symbols’ of art-works or literary texts, but there is something odd in so speaking. For we cannot strictly say what they symbolise in the way that we can explicate (up to a point, anyway) the symbols of mathematics.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-24 03:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表