找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Corpses in Belgian Anatomy, 1860–1914; Nobody’s Dead Tinne Claes Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

[复制链接]
楼主: 声音会爆炸
发表于 2025-3-25 06:42:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 08:34:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 15:26:20 | 显示全部楼层
Beihilfen- und Subventionsrechtther they ended up in museums (as preserved body parts), in a grave or down the drain (as medical waste). By studying distinct ways of preservation and disposal together, this chapter sketches a multifaceted view of the fate of anatomical remains that was not necessarily disgraceful or abhorrent. Th
发表于 2025-3-25 18:58:50 | 显示全部楼层
Personenbezogene Gefahrenabwehrring her own research on Belgium with other national and regional cases, she argues that the decades around 1900 were a pivotal moment in the history of anatomy. Cultural, religious and personal sensibilities began to affect the treatment of the corpse in anatomy from acquisition to disposal: anatom
发表于 2025-3-25 20:57:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:03:57 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-030-20117-3The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
发表于 2025-3-26 07:14:00 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,he practices of anatomists as the pinnacle of objectification. Dismembered, dissected and conserved, deceased persons were converted into dead objects. Claes shows that this interpretation, though valuable, should be reassessed and limited in time. Around 1900, anatomists started to treat the body a
发表于 2025-3-26 09:07:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 13:12:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 18:23:15 | 显示全部楼层
Under the Scalpel: Dividing the Body,n the late nineteenth century. Claes shows that medical faculties solved the lack of bodies for education through a redefinition of the autopsy. The autopsy was a compromise, accommodating educational, social and scientific changes. By distinguishing autopsy from dissection, medical faculties in Bel
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 11:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表