Titlebook: Controversies in Latin American Bioethics; Eduardo Rivera-López,Martin Hevia Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 sexual and repr

难受

书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics网络公开度




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics被引频次




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics年度引用




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics读者反馈




书目名称Controversies in Latin American Bioethics读者反馈学科排名

anarchist

Cholesterol

内疚

The Legal Status of Surrogacy in Latin Americaa that surrogacy corrupts maternity; “child welfare concerns,” that is, the idea that surrogacy should not be allowed because of its effects on resulting children; and the potential exploitation of surrogates. The author of this article concludes that these objections are not convincing but that the

会犯错误

Innovative Care in Latin America: Definition, Justification and Ethical Principlest chapter scrutinizes this nascent field of inquiry in Latin America and offers a conceptual framework for innovation as well as its ethical justification. As we will argue, an important use of the term “innovation” or “innovative care” is best interpreted as “new non-validated practice” and not as

Militia

Ethics in Conducting and Communicating Research: A Brazilian Perspectiveresults being funded or produced under their auspices are reliable. In this article, we make an incursion into the process of production of technological knowledge—through the stages of financing, production itself, and dissemination—in an effort to identify the factors that can lead to misconduct.

Militia

Inculcate

Reazioni psicologiche alle malattie at risk. However, according to those with a conservative view on abortion, none of this justifies the intentional killing of an embryo, which they take as a person with a right to life. I argue that there are no good arguments in favor of considering an embryo to be a person since on all accounts,

集合

背景

Introduzione ,. Nel backstage di una scheda,a that surrogacy corrupts maternity; “child welfare concerns,” that is, the idea that surrogacy should not be allowed because of its effects on resulting children; and the potential exploitation of surrogates. The author of this article concludes that these objections are not convincing but that the