找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures; Chungmin Lee,Ferenc Kiefer,Manfred Krifka Book 2017 Spring

[复制链接]
楼主: Consonant
发表于 2025-3-28 17:43:59 | 显示全部楼层
Scalar Implicatures with Alternative Semanticsmatrix-level sets of alternatives), it can generate correct scalar implicatures while avoiding several problems proposed in prior literature. The problems solved include implicature generation when a quantifier appears in a disjunction (Chierchia .) and when a sentence includes complex quantifiers like “more than two” (Krifka .).
发表于 2025-3-28 22:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
Evaluation, Perception and Reflectionstivity condition that exactly one disjunct holds. CT and CF constructions are cross-linguistically witnessed. CF, in parallelism with ALT-Q, may shed some light on the problematic exceptions to suspension of scalar implicatures in DE contexts such as antecedents of conditionals, and similar problems as well.
发表于 2025-3-28 23:07:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 06:54:20 | 显示全部楼层
Evaluation, Perception and Reflectionbe referentially identified). The referential identification of a set consists in the exhaustive listing of its members—hence the exhaustivity of focus. It is claimed that this analysis also accounts for properties of focus movement constructions that current alternative theories cannot explain.
发表于 2025-3-29 10:59:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 12:26:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 17:14:15 | 显示全部楼层
0924-4670 l, state-of-the-art views on central topics in linguistic reA group of authors containing both leading authorities and young researchers addresses a number of issues of contrastiveness, polarity items and exhaustivity, quantificational expressions and the implicatures they generate, and the interact
发表于 2025-3-29 23:28:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 01:49:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 04:24:16 | 显示全部楼层
Grenzwerte, Stetigkeit, Differenziation, similar to English . and the additive particle –., which is similar to .. Furthermore, to account for the difference between –. and . or ., I assume that –. in –. introduces an additive presupposition weaker than that of ., . or ..
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-19 00:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表