Titlebook: Contender States and Modern Chinese International Thought; From the Republican Ferran Perez Mena Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

表被动

e not only Chinese IR, but also Non-Western and Global IR.UsThis book contends that the development of modern Chinese international thought has been profoundly shaped by the distinctive nature of the Chinese state as a contender state and its global positioning since 1912. The argument posited demon

sorbitol

Hjordis M. Foy,J. Thomas Graystone production of modern Chinese international thought from a genuine international perspective, addressing the widespread internalism and methodological nationalism that permeates much of the mainstream literature on the origins and development of an indigenous IR theory in mainland China.

Inflamed

熔岩

artless

mortuary

滑稽

Alfred S. Evans,James C. Niedermanle due to three global and interconnected processes: the introduction of ideologies of modernity such as Socialism, Social Darwinism, and Liberalism through the migration of Chinese intellectuals to imperial Japan in the early twentieth century; the revolutionary events unfolding in Tzarist Russia f

integral

Gary D. Gottfredson,Denise C. Gottfredsonn, the United States, and China. This chapter delineates how the Maoist era was characterized by two defining and interrelated geopolitical moments that significantly influenced the production of Chinese international thought. Firstly, during the period preceding the Sino-Soviet split (1956–1966), C

Psa617

Gary D. Gottfredson,Denise C. Gottfredsonter 1978, characterized by China’s capitalist restoration and a gradual, selective economic integration into the international liberal order, profoundly shaped the production of modern Chinese international thought. This thought began to embrace the Anglo-American IR tradition as a means to depoliti

磨碎