找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Constructivism in Science Education; A Philosophical Exam Michael R. Matthews Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 cons

[复制链接]
查看: 34717|回复: 51
发表于 2025-3-21 18:21:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Constructivism in Science Education
副标题A Philosophical Exam
编辑Michael R. Matthews
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Constructivism in Science Education; A Philosophical Exam Michael R. Matthews Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 cons
描述Constructivism is one of the most influential theories incontemporary education and learning theory. It has had great influencein science education. The papers in this collection represent,arguably, the most sustained examination of the theoretical andphilosophical foundations of constructivism yet published. .Topics covered include: orthodox epistemology and the philosophicaltraditions of constructivism; the relationship of epistemology tolearning theory; the connection between philosophy and pedagogy inconstructivist practice; the difference between radical and socialconstructivism, and an appraisal of their epistemology; the strengthsand weaknesses of the Strong Programme in the sociology of science andimplications for science education. The book contains an extensivebibliography. .Contributors include philosophers of science, philosophers ofeducation, science educators, and cognitive scientists. The book isnoteworthy for bringing this diverse range of disciplines together inthe examination of a central educational topic.
出版日期Book 1998
关键词constructivism; education; objectivity; science; science education; sociology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5032-3
isbn_softcover978-0-7923-4924-2
isbn_ebook978-94-011-5032-3
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Constructivism in Science Education影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education网络公开度




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education被引频次




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education被引频次学科排名




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education年度引用




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education年度引用学科排名




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education读者反馈




书目名称Constructivism in Science Education读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:23:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:51:25 | 显示全部楼层
Jürgen Hampel,Andreas Klinke,Ortwin Renne concepts, positions and arguments for the latter than is immediately available in the paper. Part II discusses the problem of intersubjectivity in constructivism. The general conclusions drawn from these sections is that the basic concepts and theses of constructivism are, mostly, at best very obs
发表于 2025-3-22 10:30:00 | 显示全部楼层
Robert Backhaus,Gerald Braun,Stefan Weiersply confused, should be devastated, if not silenced for ever. But the circumstances in the case at hand are not ordinary. W. A. Suchting calls his effort . and within the first six pages he provides an instructive example of his very own method of deconstruction. Though the traditional philosopher’s
发表于 2025-3-22 15:31:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:15:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:35:23 | 显示全部楼层
Analyse der Unternehmenspotenziale,c knowledge. This paper offers a critical examination of some of the basic claims of this branch of science studies and argues that social constructivists cannot explain some of the most characteristic features of the physical sciences. The implications of social constructivism for science education
发表于 2025-3-23 02:48:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:07:19 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55893-1upon the rationale and practice of science teaching. It is maintained that if the claims of SSK are true then there are serious, and educationally and culturally deleterious, implications which follow. The two articles will argue that, fortunately, the claims of SSK for the external causation of sci
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-4 06:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表