Titlebook: Constructing Post-Imperial Britain: Britishness, ‘Race‘ and the Radical Left in the 1960s; Jodi Burkett Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a di

Afflict

Britain’s Relationships with Other Powersin’s ongoing ‘greatness’ in the face of arguments about its ‘decline’. The last chapter showed how these groups thought about Britain’s world role, and ongoing British ‘greatness’ in isolation. Unfortunately this was never the case. Britain’s international position, like that of every other state, i

Guileless

Mendicant

harrow

Views of the British Peopleortant to their self-perception was their understanding of their audience and potential supporters, the British people. We saw that each of these organisations was made up of a number of internal contradictions and discrete sections in competition with each other. Similarly the ‘British people’ were

水獭

FLAT

A Unified or Divided Left?nd the AAM, or had more wide-ranging concerns, like the NUS and NICR movement, they all had clearly defined interests and main concerns. Why, then, should they have a stance on ‘race’? Why should any of these organisations or groups set up to campaign on specific issues necessarily be opposed to rac

浪荡子

INCH

Addressing ‘Race’ in Britaint immigration from Britain’s former colonies.. While immigrants from Britain’s colonies and former colonies were not the largest group in the postwar period, they garnered the most media coverage and elicited the strongest reactions from the governmental and public arenas.. The apparent ‘influx’ of