Titlebook: Constitutional Debates, Rhetoric, and Political Philosophy in Spain’s Parliamentary History; Francisco J. Bellido Book 2024 The Editor(s)

爱哭

蔓藤图饰

Wyclife Ong’eta Mose,Giuseppe T. Cirellas’, and ‘self-rule’ were used during the constitutional sessions of both constitutional debates. The Constitution of 1931 delimited the competences that were transferred to regions, whereas the Constitution of 1978 left broad margins for state decentralization, unleashing a process of growing asymmetry between Spanish regions over time.

PUT

BROTH

Introduction: Examining Political Rhetoric in Spanish Constitutional Debates,rical devices, and political philosophy’s arguments in Spain’s constitutional debates during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Firstly, it argues that each constitutional debate studied here gave rise to conceptual controversies drawn on political philosophy’s arguments. Clashing ideological v

Neutropenia

clarify

束缚

,Understanding Democracy in the Constitutional Debates of 1931 and 1977–1978,931 and the autonomist state of 1978 were designed in connection to scholarly disagreements about the advantages and flaws of centralism and federalism. Each of these designs was formulated as an alternative to the full decentralization of state competences. Concepts such as ‘competences’, ‘facultie

艰苦地移动

Competing Meanings of the New Democratic State,, on the one hand, and the conservative Popular Alliance, on the other hand. Against these three parties, during the debates of the Constituent Assembly of 1977–1978 the Communist Party of Spain, together with Catalan and Basque nationalist parties, endorsed an almost complete decentralization of st

AMPLE

Constitutional State Powers,Three aspects are of special relevance in that regard. First, popular and national sovereignty were presented as synonyms even though the Constitution only enshrined national sovereignty. Second, centrist and right-wing representatives accepted the rule of law as mainstay of democratic institutions

会犯错误