找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses; Examining Judiciary H. Chris Tecklenburg Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[复制链接]
查看: 43040|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:46:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses
副标题Examining Judiciary
编辑H. Chris Tecklenburg
视频video
概述Performs a bicameral analysis of court curbing and court structuring legislation over time.Examines court curbing and court structuring legislation from the perspective of the judiciary committees.Ana
图书封面Titlebook: Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses; Examining Judiciary  H. Chris Tecklenburg Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The
描述.This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary..
出版日期Book 2020
关键词judicial politics; judiciary committee; US Congress; House of Representatives; US Senate; court curbing; b
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44379-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-44405-1
isbn_ebook978-3-030-44379-5
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses网络公开度




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses被引频次




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses被引频次学科排名




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses年度引用




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses年度引用学科排名




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses读者反馈




书目名称Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:17:43 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2020analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary..
发表于 2025-3-22 01:47:47 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusions Involving the Relationship Between Congress and the Courts,bicameral behavior is offered next, which presents a comparison between the House and Senate results. Further areas to examine are then presented, followed by a brief account of the future relationship between Congress and the Courts.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:15:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:51:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:02:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:38:17 | 显示全部楼层
Reported Court Curbing and Administrative Court Curbing Measures,e quantitative results, which reveal that in general the House responds to polarization, while the Senate responds to the Court’s agenda, and judicial review. Interestingly, administrative court curbing, which are attempts by Congress to insulate the executive from judicial review, reveal similar outcomes.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:37:14 | 显示全部楼层
Reported Court Structuring Bills,ring ideologically divisive times with the Court. An alternate explanation is that Congress may add judges and/or courts based on the administrative needs of the federal judiciary. The quantitative results support the ideological/partisan explanation.
发表于 2025-3-23 05:02:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:00:55 | 显示全部楼层
slation from the perspective of the judiciary committees.Ana.This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 19:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表