找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Conflict in the Academy; A Study in the Socio Marcus Morgan,Patrick Baert Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

[复制链接]
查看: 40351|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 18:41:45 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Conflict in the Academy
副标题A Study in the Socio
编辑Marcus Morgan,Patrick Baert
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/236/235362/235362.mp4
图书封面Titlebook: Conflict in the Academy; A Study in the Socio Marcus Morgan,Patrick Baert Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers
描述Examining an intramural conflict that erupted within the English Faculty at Cambridge University in the early 1980s, this book develops a theoretical analysis of disputes as they unfold within the academy and explores the broader historical shifts within Higher Education and how these related to developments in Continental Europe.
出版日期Book 2015
关键词English Studies; Conflict; Sociology of intellectuals; MacCabe Affair; University of Cambridge; Performan
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137521309
isbn_ebook978-1-137-52130-9
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Conflict in the Academy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Conflict in the Academy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Conflict in the Academy网络公开度




书目名称Conflict in the Academy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Conflict in the Academy被引频次




书目名称Conflict in the Academy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Conflict in the Academy年度引用




书目名称Conflict in the Academy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Conflict in the Academy读者反馈




书目名称Conflict in the Academy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:12:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:26:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:23:30 | 显示全部楼层
Contextualising the Dispute institutional form in structuring the resultant conflict, showing in particular how colleges provided pools from which ‘performance teams’ were recruited. Overall, it argues that such material contextualisation is essential for fully comprehending the symbolic dimensions of the affair addressed in Part II.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:23:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:30:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:41:48 | 显示全部楼层
R. N. I. Pietersz,I. Steneker,H. W. Reessinke reader with the ‘facts’ of the episode, as well as to provide a description of the ‘raw material’ out of which the controversy was forged. Nearer the end of this chapter, we discuss some of the functions the controversy ended up serving for both its participants, and the ideas involved.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:53:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:27:22 | 显示全部楼层
Zeugen Jehovas und Bluttransfusion,isely termed ‘structuralism’ as a pollutant,imbued with moral threat. Thirdly, we highlight the strategic positioning move of claiming that consensus in fact ruled, and therefore that no controversy had in fact occurred, noting the difficulties, given all the attention that had already been paid to the incident, of maintaining this stance.
发表于 2025-3-23 06:03:18 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: A Storm in a Teacup?lysis of various forms of published material. We also elaborate our pragmatic approach to theory, and the critical synthesis we forge between positioning theory and cultural sociology. Finally, we briefly summarise the case, and lay out the broad structure of the book.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-18 14:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表