用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Conceptual Issues in Ecology; Esa Saarinen Book 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1982 biology.ecology.evolution.mater

[复制链接]
楼主: Harding
发表于 2025-3-28 16:00:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 21:27:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 23:37:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 04:22:23 | 显示全部楼层
,A Note on Simberloff’s ‘Succession of Paradigms in Ecology’,es in fact rely on incompatible models,. that fact may suggest interesting problems about scientific discovery and the structure of scientific theories. If such discussion is to be useful, however, some of Simberloff’s misunderstandings and misinformation should be cleared away. The following comments are intended in this spirit.
发表于 2025-3-29 08:44:07 | 显示全部楼层
Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy, germ plasm advanced in his inaugural lecture in 1883 by some five years. As Weismann’s views became one of the anchor points of the modern ‘neo-Darwinian’ theory of evolution, they led to many modern recapitulations and elaborations of Butler’s epigram. Thus Richard Dawkins writes (1976, p. 21):
发表于 2025-3-29 13:17:37 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9925-2 the roles of theory and concept, indicating the very real shortcomings of a science which is too rooted in concept. I will suggest that we set aside the bulk of our ecological concepts in order to concentrate on theory building and modification and I describe some small steps towards a predictive ecology.
发表于 2025-3-29 16:59:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 20:19:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 01:45:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 07:19:45 | 显示全部楼层
Reply,enment that, at least in the layman’s view, ought to govern their discourse. Grene’s argument (1980) forms an unusually flagrant example of this practice. Throughout, she seems unduly obsessed with my use of ‘idealism,’ as if I had used this term in a vacuum. Grene observes that “such terms as ‘idea
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-10 00:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表