Titlebook: Conceptual Change; Glenn Pearce,Patrick Maynard Book 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1973 Hilary Putnam.bibliography

疲惫的老马

Conceptual Change,s: those who speak of a revolution in belief and those who speak of a conceptual revolution. The disagreement is a typically philosophical one, since what is at issue is not the facts but rather the categories in terms of which their deep connections with other facts are to be made manifest.

breadth

venous-leak

Logic and Conceptual Change,tructure; to a distinction between its various aspects and to the manner in which they may suffer or resist modification; and lastly to a brief consideration of the causes of conceptual change. The remarks made in the first part of this essay will then in its second part be exemplified by, and appli

COWER

自由职业者

凝结剂

Mechanics

Referential Indeterminacy: A Response to Professor Putnam,f Science, and in the other of which (the first half) he sketches elements of an alternative theory of his own. I shall comment only on Putnam’s theory, ignoring his attack on positivism. In thus taking advantage of the fact that philosophical positions tend to be relatively hard to defend and relat

VALID

宿醉

Linguistic Relativity,its most notable exponent;. indeed it is sometimes referred to as the ‘Whorf hypothesis.’ But its roots go back at least to Kant, and it has been echoed in various forms by a diverse collection of psychologists, linguists, anthropologists, and philosophers.

充满人