Titlebook: Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines; James H. Fetzer Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001 Prolog.artif

Bouquet

Book 2001plain why the prevailing paradigm -the computational conception of language and mentality - can nolonger be sustained. An alternative approach is advanced, inspired bythe work of Charles S. Peirce, according to which minds are sign-using(or `semiotic‘) systems, which in turn generates distinctions b

异常

Iniquitous

傻

Book 2001d limits of computer and AIsystems can be more adequately appraised and alternative accounts ofconsciousness and cognition can be more thoroughly criticised. ..Readership:. Intermediate and advanced students of computerscience, AI, cognitive science, and all students of the philosophy ofthe mind.

entrance

Eviction

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48661-5ndermine what we take as our best theories. The computational conception that dominates what is known as “cognitive science” provides a remarkable illustration of this point. Even if some of our thought processes are computational, most of them are not, which makes . either trivial or false. We need something better.

笼子

Signs and Minds and .). Indeed, this perspective has been said to be “the heart of research in artificial intelligence” (., p. 3), a view that appears to be representative of its standing within the community at large.

枫树

执拗

0924-0780 s and cognition can be more thoroughly criticised. ..Readership:. Intermediate and advanced students of computerscience, AI, cognitive science, and all students of the philosophy ofthe mind.978-1-4020-0243-4978-94-010-0973-7Series ISSN 0924-0780