找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Computerization and Work; A Reader on Social A Ulrich Briefs,John Kjaer,Jean-Louis Rigal Conference proceedings 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin

[复制链接]
楼主: Motion
发表于 2025-3-25 03:24:29 | 显示全部楼层
Hegel: The Entanglements of the Present,s, however, become such a “hot” topic that in many cases technological change is interpreted as change involving information technology. This is unfortunate as technological change (of course) is vastly more diversified. There are other important major trends, in Norway the obvious example is the de
发表于 2025-3-25 10:22:32 | 显示全部楼层
Marx: Freeing Ourselves from Ourselves,aused by automation, by means of reforming the educational system and introducing specific training measurements? It has been proposed to overcome employees’ adaption to automation process on the one hand and to gain certain perspectives for their interests on the other hand. The starting point of t
发表于 2025-3-25 14:55:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 19:10:02 | 显示全部楼层
Treatment and Management of FXTAS,le of information as an organizational resource is not very well understood, especially as it is related to the organization’s environment. What does appear is that computerized information systems have become a facilitating technology that interacts with organizational, historical, and environmenta
发表于 2025-3-25 22:26:17 | 显示全部楼层
Radiological Findings in FXTAS, development in this technological field. The conflicts which became apparent so far seem to center more on “qualitative” impacts (like degradation of traditional skills). The employment effects of computer systems, nevertheless, are at least in the longrun overwhelmingly negative, in the short-run
发表于 2025-3-26 03:54:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 07:43:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 10:19:32 | 显示全部楼层
IFIP State-of-the-Art Reportshttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/234572.jpg
发表于 2025-3-26 14:07:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 20:49:56 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-97101-3) paradigm, including the conservative myth of the “one best way”. If we want to solve the dilemna “how not to be luddist ?”. We show -using the case of bank workers- that we need a radical change of organisational and cultural paradigms; and first a new definition of work, workers, jobs and production.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-29 04:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表