找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions; Eva Steiner Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzer

[复制链接]
查看: 37304|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 19:12:17 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions
编辑Eva Steiner
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/232/231041/231041.mp4
概述Provides elements of knowledge and analysis from over 15 legal systems around the world.Deals with a highly relevant topic, understudied in contemporary legal writing.Invites a complete reassessment o
丛书名称Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law
图书封面Titlebook: Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions;  Eva Steiner Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzer
描述.This work deals with the temporal effect of judicial decisions and more specifically, with the hardship caused by the retroactive operation of overruling decisions. By means of a jurisprudential and comparative analysis, the book explores several issues created by the overruling of earlier decisions..Overruling of earlier decisions, when it occurs, operates retrospectively with the effect that it infringes the principle of legal certainty through upsetting any previous arrangements made by a party to a case under long standing precedents established previously by the courts. On this account, in the recent past, a number of jurisdictions have had to deal with the prospect of introducing in their own systems the well-established US practice of prospective overruling whereby the court may announce in advance that it will change the relevant rule or interpretation of the rule but only for future cases. However, adopting prospective overruling raises a series of issues mainly related to the constitutional limits of the judicial function coupled by the practical difficulties attendant upon such a practice. This book answers a number of the questions raised by this practice. It makes use
出版日期Book 2015
关键词Comparative observations on judicial rulings; Effect of Judicial Rulings; Judge made law; Judgments in
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-38372-9
isbn_ebook978-3-319-16175-4Series ISSN 2214-6881 Series E-ISSN 2214-689X
issn_series 2214-6881
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions网络公开度




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions被引频次




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions被引频次学科排名




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions年度引用




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions年度引用学科排名




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions读者反馈




书目名称Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:09:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:39:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:47:30 | 显示全部楼层
Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Lawhttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/231041.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 11:43:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:56:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:26:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:12:33 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4Comparative observations on judicial rulings; Effect of Judicial Rulings; Judge made law; Judgments in
发表于 2025-3-23 04:59:59 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-319-38372-9Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
发表于 2025-3-23 08:07:57 | 显示全部楼层
Sparse Approximation with Basespsetting any previous arrangements made by a party to a case under long standing precedents established previously by the courts. On this account a number of jurisdictions have had to deal in recent past with the prospect of introducing in their own systems the well-established US practice of prospe
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-25 15:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表