找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law; Markku Kiikeri Book 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001 Europe.Legal Justification.Reichsre

[复制链接]
查看: 45945|回复: 36
发表于 2025-3-21 16:25:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law
编辑Markku Kiikeri
视频video
概述Includes supplementary material:
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law;  Markku Kiikeri Book 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001 Europe.Legal Justification.Reichsre
描述.Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law. deals withthe use of comparative law in European legal adjudication. Itdescribes the different forms of the use of comparative law in legalreasoning, argumentation and justification in several national legalorders and in European level legal institutions. The book begins withan inquiry into the nature of comparative law as a legal source. Afterthe description of the empirical study it ends to the general theoryof European law and several hard cases of European law are examined..The book is intended for students and researchers in European law butit also contains aspects to be taken into account in the practicalwork in European legal orders and legal institutions by judges andlegal practitioners.
出版日期Book 2001
关键词Europe; Legal Justification; Reichsrechnungslegungsverordnung; autonomy; comparative law; competition law
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0977-5
isbn_softcover978-1-4020-0284-7
isbn_ebook978-94-010-0977-5Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightKluwer Academic Publishers 2001
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law网络公开度




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law被引频次




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law年度引用




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law读者反馈




书目名称Comparative Legal Reasoning and European Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:25:59 | 显示全部楼层
Soziologie leiblicher Kopräsenzreasonable orientation of legal actors, in legal institutions, and in one form or another, towards other legal systems in an intellectual sense and the use of these observations in legal reasoning, argumentation and justification. The second dimension is related to the “importation” of domestic lega
发表于 2025-3-22 01:37:34 | 显示全部楼层
Goffman: Kopräsenz als Interaktionsordnung?role in the construction of the identities of the state legal systems and a stabilizing function in the legal consensus-creation on the question of the nature of legal systems. Contemporary comparative law moves in the realm of this structure of the state paradigm of law. This state paradigm of law,
发表于 2025-3-22 05:52:14 | 显示全部楼层
Markku KiikeriIncludes supplementary material:
发表于 2025-3-22 11:49:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:10:43 | 显示全部楼层
Soziologie leiblicher KopräsenzEuropean law is an extremely confusing phenomenon.. This is so even though the discourse in legal theory, in international law, and in different national systems all seem to reflect the traditional concept of modern positive law.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:34:51 | 显示全部楼层
Theoretische Konturen des praktischen LeibesLegal justification is, in general, based on generality argument and pro-arguments of a solution. It is a kind of an analogy between the result and the argument, which appears to be the decisive part of a justification.
发表于 2025-3-22 21:34:23 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,European law is an extremely confusing phenomenon.. This is so even though the discourse in legal theory, in international law, and in different national systems all seem to reflect the traditional concept of modern positive law.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:40:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:18:48 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-2 05:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表