找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Communicating Climate Change; The Path Forward Susanna Priest Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 climate.climat

[复制链接]
查看: 28396|回复: 38
发表于 2025-3-21 16:20:45 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Communicating Climate Change
副标题The Path Forward
编辑Susanna Priest
视频video
概述Moves beyond the question of how to persuade people that climate change exists to the question of how best to facilitate collective action.Written in accessible language so that interested non-special
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication
图书封面Titlebook: Communicating Climate Change; The Path Forward Susanna Priest Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 climate.climat
描述This book asks and answers the question of what communication research and other social sciences can offer that will help the global community to address climate change by identifying the conditions that can persuade audiences and encourage collective action on climate. .While scientists often expect that teaching people the scientific facts will change their minds about climate change, closer analysis suggests this is not always the case. Communication scholars are pursuing other ideas based on what we know about influence and persuasion, but this approach does not provide complete answers either. Some misconceptions can be corrected by education, and some messages will be more powerful than others. The advent of the Internet also makes vast stores of information readily available. But audiences still process this information through different filters, based on their own values and beliefs – including their understanding of how science works. In between momentous events, media coverage of climate tends to recede and individuals turn their attention back to their daily lives. Yet there is a path forward: Climate change is a social justice issue that no individual – and no nation –
出版日期Book 2016
关键词climate; climate change; Environmental communication; mass communication; persuasion; collective action; s
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58579-0
isbn_softcover978-1-349-84384-8
isbn_ebook978-1-137-58579-0Series ISSN 2634-6451 Series E-ISSN 2634-646X
issn_series 2634-6451
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Communicating Climate Change影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Communicating Climate Change影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Communicating Climate Change网络公开度




书目名称Communicating Climate Change网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Communicating Climate Change被引频次




书目名称Communicating Climate Change被引频次学科排名




书目名称Communicating Climate Change年度引用




书目名称Communicating Climate Change年度引用学科排名




书目名称Communicating Climate Change读者反馈




书目名称Communicating Climate Change读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:14:34 | 显示全部楼层
,In Apartheid Times, 1948–1993,g collective processes, alongside studies of the psychology of individuals. In science communication research, a dialogic approach and an emphasis on public engagement programs are replacing our old “deficit” assumptions. Despite tension between strategic and democratic goals in science communication, there is a path forward.
发表于 2025-3-22 02:15:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:20:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:54:15 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287457tituencies reject some potential climate solutions. Meanwhile, the proliferation of Internet-based information sources, operating without journalists as gatekeepers, has profound implications. Studies of information seekers and how they process what they find provide additional insights.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:23:56 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94922-8ons through processes of discussion, replication, and review. Naturally those processes are imperfect, but they generate the best knowledge we have. Part of this new “critical” science literacy is understanding the nature of scientific consensus.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:17:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:51:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:20:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:57:54 | 显示全部楼层
,What’s the Rush? Reacting to a Slow-Moving Disaster,nd powerful interests encourage “skeptical” thinking on the issue of climate. Both our social environment—the perceived “climate” of public opinion—and our changing media system influence our perspectives.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 21:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表