找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth; An Empirical Defence Joseph Ulatowski Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 End

[复制链接]
查看: 23717|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:05:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth
副标题An Empirical Defence
编辑Joseph Ulatowski
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/231/230321/230321.mp4
概述Addresses a gap in the literature by foregrounding the work of Arne Naess and approaches in experimental philosophy.Outlines the case for an innovative theory of pluralism about truth, endoxic alethic
图书封面Titlebook: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth; An Empirical Defence Joseph Ulatowski Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 End
描述.Truth is a pervasive feature of ordinary language, deserving of systematic study, and few theorists of truth have endeavoured to chronicle the tousled conceptual terrain forming the non-philosopher’s ordinary view. In this book, the author recasts the philosophical treatment of truth in light of historical and recent work in experimental philosophy. He argues that the commonsense view of truth is deeply fragmented along two axes, across different linguistic discourses and among different demographics, termed in the book as .endoxic alethic pluralism. .To defend this view, four conclusions must be reached: (1) endoxic alethic pluralism should be compatible with how the everyday person uses truth, (2) the common conception of truth should be derivable from empirical data, (3) this descriptive metaphysical project is one aspect of a normative theory of truth, and (4) endoxic alethic pluralism is at least partially immune to challenges facing the ecological method in experimental philosophy and alethic pluralism. .
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Endoxic alethic pluralism; Experimental philosophy; Metaphysics; Ecology; Empirical semantics; Arne Næss;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88782-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-69465-8
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth网络公开度




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth被引频次




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth被引频次学科排名




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth年度引用




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth年度引用学科排名




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth读者反馈




书目名称Commonsense Pluralism about Truth读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:44:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:39:02 | 显示全部楼层
Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik,Uwe Warnerand that responses merely provide a theorist with a wide topographical view of the commonsense conceptual terrain. It is our theoretical responsibility to argue for any philosophical conclusion, but that can be done from the armchair. The second part of the chapter shows the ecological approach in a
发表于 2025-3-22 06:15:57 | 显示全部楼层
Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik,Uwe Warnerenerally assumed that the ordinary notion of truth aligns with their own intuitions about truth, data show that philosophers and non-philosophers’ notions of truth fail to align. Data exist showing that people’s responses to survey questions inquiring about a view of truth are incompatible with phil
发表于 2025-3-22 12:01:06 | 显示全部楼层
Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik,Uwe Warner methodological challenges. Methodological challenges suggest that empirical studies are irrelevant, suffer from poor experimental design or statistical analyses, or the folk suffer from serious confusion. Substantive challenges are those criticisms almost any alethic pluralism will have to face, in
发表于 2025-3-22 13:17:51 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8Endoxic alethic pluralism; Experimental philosophy; Metaphysics; Ecology; Empirical semantics; Arne Næss;
发表于 2025-3-22 17:16:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:02:38 | 显示全部楼层
Joseph UlatowskiAddresses a gap in the literature by foregrounding the work of Arne Naess and approaches in experimental philosophy.Outlines the case for an innovative theory of pluralism about truth, endoxic alethic
发表于 2025-3-23 03:39:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:42:41 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-19 03:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表