找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Common Law – Civil Law; The Great Divide? Nicoletta Bersier,Christoph Bezemek,Frederick Scha Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th

[复制链接]
楼主: 相持不下
发表于 2025-3-26 22:52:32 | 显示全部楼层
Tree Diagram or Pyramid of Norms?,For Joseph Raz, the hierarchical structure of legal orders may be described more appropriately using a tree diagram than the model of a pyramid of norms. This view is tested in this chapter, paying particular attention to the differences between civil law and common law.
发表于 2025-3-27 03:38:41 | 显示全部楼层
1572-4395 s approaching the topic against the background of different This book offers an in-depth analysis of the differences between common law and civil law systems from various theoretical perspectives. Written by a global network of experts, it explores the topic against the background of a variety of le
发表于 2025-3-27 05:21:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:28:34 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0664-0nary approaches, the civil law tradition appears to be still committed to the “science of law”. It is argued that, in the context of the latter, the moment of transcendence is the preserve of the philosophy of law.
发表于 2025-3-27 15:39:56 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,outhpiece in applying them. Perceived in this manner, common law and civil law differ as to the (main) source(s) of law, about who is to create, about who is (merely) to draw from them, about whether the law works itself pure each step of the way or whether the law’s purity may only be tarnished when confronted with a contingent set of facts.
发表于 2025-3-27 21:10:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 01:54:55 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2022global network of experts, it explores the topic against the background of a variety of legal traditions..Common law and civil law are typically presented as antagonistic players on a field claimed by diverse legal systems: the former being based on precedent set by judges in deciding cases before t
发表于 2025-3-28 02:21:49 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1622-8of . and . in adjudication—therefore, debating the construction of judicial adjudication as . and as .—, the essay proposes an understanding of . not only as an effective ., but also—and mostly—as a methodologically constitutive juridical criterion, emphasizing a normatively constitutive . (.).
发表于 2025-3-28 06:15:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 14:29:23 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-11 02:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表