Titlebook: Coleridge and the Concept of Nature; Raimonda Modiano Book 1985 Raimonda Modiano 1985 Coleridge.concept.nature.Samuel Taylor Coleridge

档案

宏伟

Tiziana Russo-Spena,Cristina Mele‘The Giant Wordsworth’ (., ., 391) remained for Coleridge an intimidating example of personal success that far outweighed anything Coleridge thought he had accomplished. While Wordsworth’s poetic star was rising, his was setting, and Coleridge saw himself increasingly pushed into the inferior role o

小臼

SEVER

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23571-0eridge’s experience of love and helped him work out personal problems in his relationship with Sara Hutchinson. Moreover, they indicate that nature loses much of its importance for Coleridge the more he links the symbol with increasingly higher goals, such as the unity ofconsciousness and the mind’s

ensemble

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00124-7d the vastly larger experience, of either joyous or devastating possibilities, gained through contact with the external world. Along withthe disappearance of the journey pattern in Coleridge’s later poetry, we also notice the change to a poetry of private meditation, which avoids dramatic confrontat

恩惠

Holger Backhaus-Maul,Christiane Rothempirically-based doctrine, he was not as eager to abandon nature as Kant or Schiller, or to use a confrontation with nature as a means of bolstering the mind’s sense of its own power. In his representation of the sublime Coleridge tried to grant nature a positive role, without denying the subjectiv

Seminar

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42430-9owever, when Milton adds the line ‘Far off their coming shone’, he achieves the ‘highest sublime. There is . completeness. So I would say that the Saviour praying on the Mountain, the Desert on one hand, the Sea on the other, the City at an immense distance below, was sublime. But I should say of th

古董

Susanne Garvis Ph.D.,Sonja Sheridan Ph.D. books and formal training and who often criticized Coleridge for his devotion to metaphysics instead of nature, with as radical a thinker as Kant. But Wordsworth’s little-known essay written about 1811 (‘The Sublime and the Beautiful’). strongly suggests that he was familiar with Kant’s ‘Analytic o

NEXUS

Service Learning in Higher Educationtracted to Kant, he approached Kant’s philosophy cautiously, particularly where he perceived that taking a Kantian position meant a radical denial of the natural world. Although Coleridge firmly supported Kant’s view that the sublime resides in the mind and not in objects, he stretched and adjusted

歌唱队

Service Learning in Higher Educationojected version, the ‘Logosophia’ was to include a separate treatise on ‘the Dynamic or Constructive Philosophy as opposed to the Mechanic’ and another on ‘the Systems of Giordano Bruno, Behmen, and Spinoza’ (., ., 687). Although Coleridge’s . turned out to be no more than a ‘poignant illusion’, as