Titlebook: Cold-War Propaganda in the 1950s; Gary D. Rawnsley (Lecturer in Politics) Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

失败主义者

deactivate

Book 1999l material which has only been accessible to researchers in the last few years, the authors discuss propaganda‘s international and domestic dimensions, and chart the development of a shared Cold War culture. They demonstrate how the structures of propaganda which were organised at this time endured,

牵连

轻推

dimensions, and chart the development of a shared Cold War culture. They demonstrate how the structures of propaganda which were organised at this time endured, giving shape and meaning to the remaining years of the Cold War.978-1-349-27084-2978-1-349-27082-8

无价值

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8119-6individuals were mere cogs in ‘the system’:‘hidden persuaders’ had burrowed under the skin of modern ‘mass society’.. Terms such as ‘brainwashing’ gave graphic expression to this ‘loss of confidence in our capacity as individuals to master our world’, as one social scientist wrote in 1959..

行乞

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-8119-6s allies in Europe. An unusual feature of the propaganda effort was the important role played by a private firm, the United Fruit Company, which also had significant influence over the formation and execution of policy toward Guatemala.

HAUNT

LIKEN

978-1-349-27084-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999

谈判

Beyond Diplomacy: Propaganda and the History of the Cold War,manoeuvres as economies, through private enterprise or government intervention, sought constant expansion; however, all this was meaningless if populations did not endorse and, in some cases, proselytize the values that proved their superiority.

Mutter

,A Cinema of Suspicion , a Suspicion of Cinema: Soviet Film 1945–53,y had also found it most difficult to utilize and dangerously subtle and complex. Thus they, and in particular Stalin, came to believe that cinema must be kept simple in content and under tight control. This suspicious approach to the medium was to be the most important factor in the development of Soviet cinema in the postwar era.