Titlebook: Cold War Social Science; Transnational Entang Mark Solovey,Christian Dayé Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

鸵鸟

Book 2021 power, and national aspirations, the studies gathered here open up new lines of transnational investigation. Considering developments in a wide array of fields – anthropology, development studies, economics, education, political science, psychology, science studies, and sociology – that involved th

继承人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-697-9g of Chinese pedagogy’s engagements with psychology and its changing position within the competitive international arena raises questions about the use of the Cold War as a concept and periodic descriptor for understanding the history of the psychological and social sciences in the post–World War II era.

Volatile-Oils

Hematologic and Lymphoid Neoplasiay significant, she introduced a power-sensitive analysis of the geography of knowledge, according to which the case of Indian development emerged as an increasingly important exemplar in her call for a decentered international social science.

运动性

Modicum

Decentering Cold War Social Science: Alva Myrdal’s Social Scientific Internationalism at UNESCO, 195y significant, she introduced a power-sensitive analysis of the geography of knowledge, according to which the case of Indian development emerged as an increasingly important exemplar in her call for a decentered international social science.

过度

sychology, science studies, and sociology – that involved the movement of people, projects, funding, and ideas across diverse national contexts, this volume pushes scholars to rethink certain fundamental points about how we should understand – and thus how we should study – Cold War social science itself. .978-3-030-70248-9978-3-030-70246-5

diabetes

Molecular Neuroanatomy of 5-HT Receptorsxploring how transnational across different Cold War settings inspired debate over fundamental questions concerning the nature and meaning of the social sciences. Along the way, this volume urges us to rethink certain fundamental points about how we should understand—and thus study—the Cold War itself.

离开

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1776-7orks and engagement with viewpoints rooted in contexts beyond the US. In particular, Wagley relied on close links to the transnational field of Americanist anthropology. He also embraced the Lusotropicalist discourse of Brazilian intellectuals and elites.

AIL

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76478-8rn modernization and merged it with an emphasis on pre-colonial heritage in the Philippines with the aim of contributing to his homeland’s post-World War II nation-building efforts. Moreover, Jocano’s work contributed to Philippine Dictator Ferdinand Marcosʼs ideology for a “New Society.”

排他