Titlebook: Coherence, Truth and Testimony; Ulrich Gähde,Stephan Hartmann Book 2005 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2005 coherence.foundation.iss

娱乐某人

书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony网络公开度




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony被引频次




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony被引频次学科排名




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony年度引用




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony年度引用学科排名




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony读者反馈




书目名称Coherence, Truth and Testimony读者反馈学科排名

不幸的人

煞费苦心

Coherence and the Truth Connection,th this is just a matter of luck. Coherence theories embrace falliblism, to be sure, but that does not sustain the objection. Coherence is connected with truth by principles of justified acceptance that explain the connection between coherence and truth. Coherence is connected with truth by explanatory principle, not just luck.

机构

无辜

Ulrich Gähde,Stephan HartmannThe topic of the book is "hot" at the moment.The book makes novel philosophical as well as technical contributions to the literature.The essays are very well written and the collection is suited as a

BROW

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/229194.jpg

BROW

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08786-9ss automatically respond to a claim by accepting it, as long as the claim made is consistent with their beliefs and the source is credible. Otherwise, people enter a reflective pathway in which they evaluate the claim based on its explanatory coherence with everything else they believe. Computer sim

错事

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08786-9a higher degree of coherence among pieces of evidence raises to a higher degree the probability of the proposition they support. I argue against this view on the basis of three related observations. First, we should be able to assess the impact of coherence on any hypothesis of interest the evidence

上流社会

Affine maps between semimodules,ome reasons for believing that no probabilistic measure will ever be able to adequately capture coherence. First, there can be no function whose arguments are nothing but tuples of probabilities, and which assigns different values to pairs of propositions (A, B) and (A, C) if A implies both B and C,

Kinetic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0383-3 in the content of a set of propositions is positively affected by the coherence of the set, and (ii) that coherence can be characterized in probabilistic terms. There has been a longstanding question of how to construct a measure of coherence. We will show that Bayesian Coherentism cannot rest on a