找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Co-Evolution of Nature and Society; Foundations for Inte Jens Jetzkowitz Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

[复制链接]
楼主: 监督
发表于 2025-3-23 11:52:47 | 显示全部楼层
Where Do We Stand?,nces of the conceptual separation of knowledge and action. Its conceptual design marks the standard in terms of the type of problems that any conception relating knowledge, nature, and action must tackle until today.
发表于 2025-3-23 17:39:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 21:58:00 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05340-5lly used to set up research cooperations with the natural sciences. He also debates the much-hyped concept of transdisciplinarity and discusses the question of whether coevolutionary science may itself be viewed as a perspective of knowledge production.
发表于 2025-3-24 01:17:17 | 显示全部楼层
Coevolutionary Science,fect. Subsequently, various concepts and ideas are combined to outline an understanding of reality which opens up possibilities of sustainable development and unfolds the meaning of coevolutionary research.
发表于 2025-3-24 06:23:04 | 显示全部楼层
Perspectives of Coevolutionary Science in Sustainability Discourse,lly used to set up research cooperations with the natural sciences. He also debates the much-hyped concept of transdisciplinarity and discusses the question of whether coevolutionary science may itself be viewed as a perspective of knowledge production.
发表于 2025-3-24 07:49:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 11:49:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 17:48:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 19:19:22 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2019volution is needed to explore paths to a sustainable future. Jens Jetzkowitz initially discusses why social science knowledge only rarely finds its way into sustainability discourse. One significant issue is a view of science that separates knowing and acting, and the book illustrates current proble
发表于 2025-3-25 02:56:01 | 显示全部楼层
What Is the Problem?,f these questions, Jetzkowitz draw attention to the relationship of conceptual thinking, future expectation, and action by discussing Marx’ and Engels’ methodological approach to society and history. What becomes evident here is that it is crucial for sustainability discourse to consider knowledge a
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 22:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表