找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Closing the Justice Gap for Adult and Child Sexual Assault; Rethinking the Adver Anne Cossins Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

[复制链接]
楼主: 精明
发表于 2025-3-23 11:05:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:06:22 | 显示全部楼层
Anne CossinsPresents decades of research including the 2019 NSW Law Reform Commission report.First book of its kind to examine key reform issues associated with trial processes specifically.Appeals to academics,
发表于 2025-3-23 21:31:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 23:40:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 03:53:37 | 显示全部楼层
,‘Commonsense’ or ‘Life Experience’: Jurors’ Perceptions of Guilt, is an element of the offence, the defendant committed the sexual act but did so with the complainant’s consent; or (iii) the defendant had a mistaken but honest belief in consent (see further Chapter .).
发表于 2025-3-24 10:34:56 | 显示全部楼层
,‘No Means Yes and Yes Means Anal’: The Cultural Climate in Which Sex Offences Are Prosecuted,normative activity, sex, in a cultural climate where movies, television, social media, advertisements, video games and pornography regularly depict consensual sexual encounters that involve coercion or force, often reinforcing male aggression and female passivity.
发表于 2025-3-24 13:11:59 | 显示全部楼层
Cross-Examination in Sexual Assault Trials: Evidentiary Safeguard or an Opportunity to Confuse?,xamination, a process considered to be fundamental for ensuring that the defendant receives a fair trial (see, for example, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights [ECHR]) because of its utility for testing a witness’s veracity.
发表于 2025-3-24 18:14:27 | 显示全部楼层
Contemporary Reforms to Cross-Examination,that favours the defence case. The question is whether it is in the public interest for jurors to make decisions based on manufactured inaccuracies, particularly since studies show that cross-examination which confirms pre-existing beliefs on the part of jurors will influence jury decision-making.
发表于 2025-3-24 21:33:47 | 显示全部楼层
Ulrich Kück,Minou Nowrousian,Ines Enghbecause ‘hard evidence’ is usually lacking in sexual assault trials, it can be expected that jurors will rely on extra-legal factors (myths, biases and misconceptions) in deciding a case with ambiguous evidence such as a word-against-word case.
发表于 2025-3-24 23:35:23 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-9 09:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表