找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Closing Methodological Divides; Toward Democratic Ed Kenneth R. Howe Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Self.controll

[复制链接]
查看: 14435|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:43:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Closing Methodological Divides
副标题Toward Democratic Ed
编辑Kenneth R. Howe
视频video
概述Includes supplementary material:
丛书名称Philosophy and Education
图书封面Titlebook: Closing Methodological Divides; Toward Democratic Ed Kenneth R. Howe Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Self.controll
描述The issues I treat in this book—qualitative versus quantitative methods, facts versus values, science versus politics, subjectivity versus objectivity, postm- ernism versus pragmatism, to name a few—are at the core of a lively, sometimes divisive, conversation that has been unfolding in the theory and practice of e- cational research for some time. These issues fall squarely within the province of philosophy, and thus philosophical investigation has an especially useful contribution to make. But these issues are by no means the exclusive province of philosophy; they are ones in which a diverse group of educational theorists have had a keen interest and about which they have had important things to say. The conversation I hope to join—and to move forward—is this broad and inclusive one. Philosophy of education is at its best when it dives headlong into the fray. The book borrows liberally from my previously published work, but is far from a simple compilation. The ideas developed in Chapter 7, “On the Threat of Epistemological Bias,” are new. The ideas developed in Chapter 9, “Toward Democratic Educational Research,” are a significant extension of the application of similar ideas to
出版日期Book 2002
关键词Self; controlling; democratic education; education; educational research; ethics; evaluation; inclusion; lin
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47984-2
isbn_softcover978-1-4020-1226-6
isbn_ebook978-0-306-47984-7Series ISSN 0923-9065
issn_series 0923-9065
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Closing Methodological Divides影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides网络公开度




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides被引频次




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides被引频次学科排名




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides年度引用




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides年度引用学科排名




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides读者反馈




书目名称Closing Methodological Divides读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:42:11 | 显示全部楼层
Kenneth R. HoweIncludes supplementary material:
发表于 2025-3-22 03:46:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:03:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:07:46 | 显示全部楼层
978-1-4020-1226-6Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002
发表于 2025-3-22 15:34:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:53:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:09:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:16:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:34:23 | 显示全部楼层
0923-9065 s politics, subjectivity versus objectivity, postm- ernism versus pragmatism, to name a few—are at the core of a lively, sometimes divisive, conversation that has been unfolding in the theory and practice of e- cational research for some time. These issues fall squarely within the province of philos
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-25 01:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表