Titlebook: Closed-End Fund Pricing; Theories and Evidenc Seth C. Anderson,Jeffery A. Born Book 2002 Springer-Verlag US 2002 Funds.Investment.diversifi

Cultivate

Affable

inclusive

Other Efforts to Explain Closed-End Fund Discounts,he 1990s. In this chapter we focus on papers that address ratioual explanations for CEIC discounts. Some works re-address thernes of pre-1990 papers; while others delve into new areas. In these papers, the most popular areas of inquiry are: (A) managerial fees and expenses, (B) taxtiming options, (C

离开就切除

Idiosyncratic Closed-End Fund Studies,of these papers are idiosyncratic, and others address similar issues such as the returns that can be earned by trading strategies based on the discounts of closed-end fund shares. Yet others address matters ranging from fund IPOs to pedagogy. Here, we also summarize those earlier papers we overlooke

Acclaim

Conclusion,guments have been discarded or mitigated. We are reminded of the words of Richard McEnally, who, when referring to a different controversy in the finance literature stated, “Just because someone says it’s so, many times, doesn’t make it so.”

Breach

有害

Book 2002esearch, over the past decade. This academicresearch has focused on the nature of closed-end funds‘ discounts andpremiums and on the share price behavior of these firms. The firstbook by the authors, "Closed-End Investment Companies: Issues andAnswers," addresses closed-end fund academic articles pu

ITCH

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93699-8l assets, here and abroad. As of January 2000, the amount of assets under management by these organizations was estimated to be $12 trillion, or about $50,000 for every man, woman, and child in the United States.

充气球

pacifist