Titlebook: Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care; Daniele Chiffi Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

Herbaceous

书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care网络公开度




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care被引频次




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care被引频次学科排名




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care年度引用




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care年度引用学科排名




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care读者反馈




书目名称Clinical Reasoning: Knowledge, Uncertainty, and Values in Health Care读者反馈学科排名

诽谤

2192-6255 ods andresources from many different clinical but also non-clinical disciplines. In particular, this book shows how to leverage nursing knowledge and practice, which has been considerably neglected so far, to f978-3-030-59096-3978-3-030-59094-9Series ISSN 2192-6255 Series E-ISSN 2192-6263

Fantasy

Clinical Hypotheses in Diagnostic and Prognostic Reasoning diagnostic process is very unlikely to occur (though still possible), whereas this seems to be often the case for prognostic judgments. The reasons behind this distinction are based on the different types of uncertainty involved in diagnostic and prognostic judgments.

Venules

cajole

Nursing Knowledge and the Placebo Effecte for administering placebo in the clinical setting and have an essential role in promoting the placebo effect and reducing the nocebo effect. The beliefs responsible for the placebo effect are: (i) ., because they depend on the relationship between patients and health care professionals; (ii) ., be

催眠

Clinical Equipoise and Moral Leewayty transduction (UT) because the latter assumes the principle of indifference, which does not accommodate uncertainty in the right way. The same principle is then seen to distort also the received interpretations of CE.

催眠

Nonflammable

完成才会征服

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3211-6 diagnostic process is very unlikely to occur (though still possible), whereas this seems to be often the case for prognostic judgments. The reasons behind this distinction are based on the different types of uncertainty involved in diagnostic and prognostic judgments.

Glutinous

https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0300-0ossibility showing their validity and limitations when applied to the concept of clinical possibility. Lastly, I conjecture that clinical possibility shows some features in common with normative modalities.