找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Clinical Controversies in Device Therapy for Cardiac Arrhythmias; Jonathan S. Steinberg,Andrew E. Epstein Book 2019 Springer Nature Switze

[复制链接]
楼主: enamel
发表于 2025-3-26 21:23:34 | 显示全部楼层
Bernhard Fleischer,Hans Theumert, continuous monitoring is a standardized practice in this clinical setting. Their promising performance has led to miniaturization and further development in detection algorithms. Consequently, the scope of their use included other indications. They are increasingly being used in patients with diag
发表于 2025-3-27 02:06:03 | 显示全部楼层
Bernhard Fleischer,Hans Theumertplantation of an ICD implies implanting only in those who otherwise have an expected longevity in the absence of lethal arrhythmia, of at least 2 years, with an acceptable quality of life. Shared decision-making around ICD implantation is critical for all patients. Two populations in whom particular
发表于 2025-3-27 06:10:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:10:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 14:04:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 19:28:04 | 显示全部楼层
Dieter Muhs,Herbert Wittel,Manfred Beckertients and aims at reestablishing synchrony between right ventricular and left ventricular activation [1]. However, this form of cardiac excitation fails to emulate the multisite simultaneous endo- to epicardial activation resulting in torsional contraction, which is critical to achieve optimal cardiac output.
发表于 2025-3-27 23:36:47 | 显示全部楼层
Jonathan S. Steinberg,Andrew E. EpsteinFocuses on unsettled issues in the field of clinical cardiac electrophysiology.Presents clinical case studies to illustrate different perspectives.Provides practical advice for clinicians and staff
发表于 2025-3-28 02:05:07 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/227902.jpg
发表于 2025-3-28 07:22:10 | 显示全部楼层
,CRT Devices in Heart Failure: Does the Patient Need a Pacemaker or Defibrillator?, has ever been powered to compare the two device types; therefore cardiology society guidelines provide limited recommendations on choice of device. In this chapter we review the evidence for selecting a CRT-P or a CRT-D in individual patients.
发表于 2025-3-28 12:00:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-5 20:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表