Titlebook: Clinical Acupuncture; Scientific Basis Gabriel Stux,Richard Hammerschlag Book 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001 Opioid.acupunctur

使困惑

Figate

Guowei Ma,Yimiao Huang,Jingde Li points: (1) consciousness is maintained, allowing the patient to talk during surgery, (2) stimulation of specific acupuncture points is essential to maintain analgesia, and (3) analgesia persists long after stimulation has been terminated, allowing the patient to move without pain after surgery. Th

fodlder

天然热喷泉

事物的方面

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9ast few decades. The relatively poor resolution of the biohazardous two-dimensional x-ray technique has been effectively replaced by safer and far more sensitive optical scanning techniques, including x-ray computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging

Adulate

手术刀

Introduction to Risk Assessment,reatment as compared to a placebo or another treatment using a rigorous methodological design. Efficacy is often assessed using a double blind controlled trial design [.]. While some chapters in this book focus primarily on animal studies, the question of clinical efficacy can only be addressed in h

胡言乱语

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5595-3ic reviews have thus not yet been possible. This chapter will focus on a number of areas with at least two controlled clinical trials or at least one controlled and one noncontrolled clinical trial. This is not a systematic review; rather it is an overview of the quality of the clinical trials in th

agnostic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5595-3the “stories” — of living people. Stories are powerful. Some years ago, I was sitting in the treatment trailer at a city jail listening to women receiving acupuncture detoxification (detox) talk about their lives, their addictions, and their experiences of acupuncture care. All of it was interesting

eucalyptus

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5595-3are uniform in this finding [., ., ., ., ., ., ., .–., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., .–.]. While the literature evaluating these clinical trials continues to grow, it has focused largely on the methodological quality of the study designs and the soundness of their results, but there has been little discussio