Titlebook: Climate Change and Water Resources Planning Criteria; Kenneth D. Frederick,David C. Major,Eugene Z. Stak Book 1997 Springer Science+Busine

最有利

浮夸

COLIC

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2862-2e magnitude of the uncertainties arising from climate change on engineering design in water resources planning and (2) a restricted set of water resource planning techniques that deal with the repeated choice of investment decisions over time. The classical capacity-expansion model of operations res

Soliloquy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2862-2stal planners to evaluate shoreline protection projects. The largest effect would be felt if planners were trying to achieve the first best economic optimum. Given the current view that the seas will rise by significantly less than one meter through the year 2100, present procedures should work reas

ETCH

NIP

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7083-3e, these challenges are summarized and conceptual issues surrounding strategies for adapting water planning and project evaluation practices to this prospect are examined. The six-step planning process detailed in the . (P&G) is described; its ability to incorporate consideration of and responses to

CARK

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1051-0Climate Change; Conservation; Scale; Water Resources; Water policy; ecosystem; hydrology; hydrogeology

avenge

浪荡子

歌唱队