Titlebook: Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics; Jean Christianidis Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004 Aristotle.Histor

Scuttle

书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics网络公开度




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics被引频次




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics年度引用




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics读者反馈




书目名称Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics读者反馈学科排名

等级的上升

978-90-481-5850-8Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Ligneous

Jean ChristianidisConstitutes a "Reader book" of the history of Greek mathematics which is today rather timely in many respects

空气

生存环境

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-48370-7k mathematicians have been passed down to us almost exclusively via the works of authors such as Autolycus, Archimedes, Euclid, Apollonius, Theodosius, Menelaus, Diophantus, and Pappus, the earliest of whom wrote in the second half of the 4th century BC. Additionally Aristotle’s philosophy of scienc

无法取消

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-48370-7bei also insbesondere an die . Wissenschaften, wobei exakt hier heißen soll, daß gewisse Wissenschaften sich in ihrem methodischen Aufbau der Mathematik und der formalen Logik bedienen. In exemplarischer Form ist dies bei der Physik der Fall, und insofern diesen Aufbau begonnen zu haben, das Verdien

无法取消

无孔

NATAL

https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28773-6questions dealing with existence has given rise to a familiar thesis about ancient geometry: that its constructions were intended to serve as proofs of the existence of the constructed figures. I propose here to examine that thesis, to argue its weakness as a . account of ancient geometry, and to of

河流

https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28773-6metric algebra”. Chapter I of this paper is dedicated to an examination of the . of Apollonius. Though the central part of the “geometric algebra” is usually explained as a translation of the Babylonian algebraic techniques, it is not reasonable to attempt a determination of the nature of Book II by