找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Civil Society: Concepts, Challenges, Contexts; Essays in Honor of H Michael Hoelscher,Regina A. List,Stefan Toepler Book 2022 Springer Natu

[复制链接]
楼主: 衰退
发表于 2025-3-28 17:07:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 19:23:24 | 显示全部楼层
Scholarship, Leadership, and Institution Building: Helmut Anheier and the Nonprofit and Philanthrop on nonprofit institutions and civil society but also to broader questions of governance and global policy perspectives. Based on the keynote speech given at his retirement from his University of Heidelberg chair, this chapter commemorates Anheier’s contributions to building the academic infrastruct
发表于 2025-3-28 23:50:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 04:53:06 | 显示全部楼层
Dealing with Civility: Citizenship, Real Citizens, and the Science of Civil Society vary widely in the literature, but two dimensions might be useful for structuring the conceptual field: good manners versus substantive civility (Edward Shils) and emphasis on social relations versus emphasis on politics. The focus here is on substantive and political civility, i.e., civicness. It
发表于 2025-3-29 09:42:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 14:29:36 | 显示全部楼层
Social Innovation: Not Without Civil Society sector of society. However, we argue that civil society actors have special resources to identify unsolved social problems and broad competencies to develop solutions, and their independence allows them to easily pilot solutions. After the concept of social innovation is introduced, we discuss the
发表于 2025-3-29 18:28:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 20:46:42 | 显示全部楼层
Using the System of National Accounts Framework to Measure Social Impacts of Social Economy Instituts been a daunting task. The assessment of social economy contributions toward broader policy goals requires a macro-level perspective, allowing a comparison of social economy institutions to other types of economic actors across industries and countries. A conceptual framework allowing such a macro-
发表于 2025-3-30 01:56:58 | 显示全部楼层
From Anheier’s Civil Society Diamond to a Principled Fundraising Jurisprudence for Civil Societycase law that developed across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries has not provided any substantial organizing principles. Consequently, fundraising law is fragmented, not always fit for purpose, often confusing, commonly supervised by multiple regulators, and frequently difficult to navigate. Th
发表于 2025-3-30 05:19:24 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-19 06:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表