找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives; Ruth Lister,Jo Campling Textbook 1997Latest edition Ruth Lister 1997 feminism.participation.Policy.wom

[复制链接]
查看: 30454|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 18:13:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives
编辑Ruth Lister,Jo Campling
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/227/226786/226786.mp4
图书封面Titlebook: Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives;  Ruth Lister,Jo Campling Textbook 1997Latest edition Ruth Lister 1997 feminism.participation.Policy.wom
描述This book is an important contribution to the general literature on citizenship. It draws on a range of disciplines to address theoretical and policy dilemmas in the construction of women‘s citizenship. Traditional thinking about citizenship is recast to embrace both rights and political participation in the development of a ‘woman-friendly‘ theory and praxis of citizenship, challenging conventional dichotomies and taking account of the differences between women. The barriers to women‘s full citizenship are explored, together with strategies for overcoming them.
出版日期Textbook 1997Latest edition
关键词feminism; participation; Policy; women; sociology of citizenship
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26209-0
copyrightRuth Lister 1997
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives网络公开度




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives被引频次




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives被引频次学科排名




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives年度引用




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives年度引用学科排名




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives读者反馈




书目名称Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:18:29 | 显示全部楼层
Raman Mittal,Kshitij Kumar Singh30). While attempts to elaborate such a conception demonstrate the difficulties, I will argue that this is the direction citizenship theory has to take, in relation to citizenship both as a status and a practice, if it is to match up to its inclusionary and universalist claims. Thus, rejecting the ‘
发表于 2025-3-22 01:16:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:18:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:34:00 | 显示全部楼层
What is Citizenship?reviews the main elements that constitute the language of citizenship and that, in different combinations, provide the ingredients of the various definitions attempted in the literature — academic and political. Second, it discusses the main ways in which the concept is contested, leaving until late
发表于 2025-3-22 13:47:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:23:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:17:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:51:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:38:45 | 显示全部楼层
Beyond Dichotomyk over the former strategy. Yet the alternative likewise runs the risk of suppressing the differences between women and experience suggests that it is problematic. This chapter lays the groundwork for a consideration of the potential for a feminist conceptualisation and practice of citizenship that attempts to synthesise the two approaches.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-25 13:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表