Titlebook: Citing Shakespeare; The Reinterpretation Peter Erickson Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2007 culture.Englis

Brittle

Multiple

paradigm

原谅

对待

Introduction: Allusion as Revision,ifferent. Having prompted our anticipation of Shakespearean allusion, she refuses to fulfill the expectation she has set up. The poem uses no words from Shakespeare whatsoever. Hence Shakespeare is present in name only; the sole allusion is to an author whose role is quite literally nominal.

其他

蘑菇

商业上

哀求

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59833-3emotional euphoria that resists critical analysis. it is impossible not to feel moved by the exuberance of Robeson’s claim. Yet it is equally hard to avoid wincing at the quality of overstatement in his declaration. Our dilemma involves the copresence of two stories, one celebratory and the other skeptical: both stories must be told.

CRAMP

Kurt Lücke,Rolf Rixen,Ursula Schmidt for Shakespeare” (21)—Coetzee records his criticism of Shakespeare’s “declamatory pitch”: “But Chaucer keeps a nice ironic distance from his authorities. And, unlike Shakespeare, he does not get into a froth about things and start ranting” (21).