找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics; Celebrating the Firs Alex C. Michalos,Deborah C. Poff Book 2013 Springer Science+Bus

[复制链接]
查看: 7687|回复: 65
发表于 2025-3-21 17:49:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics
副标题Celebrating the Firs
编辑Alex C. Michalos,Deborah C. Poff
视频video
概述Includes the most influential articles published in the field of business ethics over the past 30 years.An introductory essay by the founding editors of the Journal.Traces the growth of the field on t
丛书名称Advances in Business Ethics Research
图书封面Titlebook: Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics; Celebrating the Firs Alex C. Michalos,Deborah C. Poff Book 2013 Springer Science+Bus
描述.The Journal of Business Ethics. was founded by Alex C. Michalos and Deborah C. Poff and published its first issue in March 1982. It is the most frequently cited business ethics journal in the world. The Journal has always offered a multi-disciplinary and international public forum for the discussion of issues concerning the interaction of successful business and moral virtue. Its authors and readers are primarily scholars and students in social sciences and philosophy , with special interests in the interaction of these disciplines with business or corporate responsibility. Since the field of business ethics grew simultaneously with the growth of the Journal, a collection of its most cited articles is tantamount to a collection of the articles that had the greatest influence in defining the field over its first 30 years of development. In this anniversary volume, an overview of citation classics from the Journal is presented, the 33 most frequently cited articles are reproduced and brief reflections on the impact of the Journal on the field are given from over 100 scholars who authored citation classics and/or distinguished papers, as well as those who served on the Editorial Boar
出版日期Book 2013
关键词Applied and Professional Ethics; Business Ethics; Business and Society; Corporate Social Responsibility
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4126-3
isbn_softcover978-94-007-4125-6
isbn_ebook978-94-007-4126-3Series ISSN 2520-1654 Series E-ISSN 2520-1662
issn_series 2520-1654
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics网络公开度




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics被引频次




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics年度引用




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics读者反馈




书目名称Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:54:04 | 显示全部楼层
Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics,n process whereby the original 33 item inventory was reduced to eight items. These eight items comprise the following ethical dimensions: a moral equity dimension, a relativism dimension, and a contractualism dimension. The multidimensional ethics scale demonstrates significant predictive ability.
发表于 2025-3-22 03:23:53 | 显示全部楼层
Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory,ial, complex and unclear. This article tries to clarify the situation, “mapping the territory” by classifying the main CSR theories and related approaches in four groups: (1) instrumental theories, in which the corporation is seen as only an instrument for wealth creation, and its social activities
发表于 2025-3-22 04:43:59 | 显示全部楼层
A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making,-maker’s social, government and legal, work, professional and personal environments. The effect of individual decision maker attributes on the decision process is also discussed. The model links these influences with ethical and unethical behavior via the mediating structure of the individual’s deci
发表于 2025-3-22 09:25:02 | 显示全部楼层
,The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede’s Typology,business ethics have recognized the importance of culture in ethical decision-making, few have examined . this influences ethical decision-making. Therefore, this paper develops propositions concerning the influence of various cultural dimensions on ethical decision-making using Hofstede’s typology.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:28:19 | 显示全部楼层
Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, and Management,o, 1969) theory of cognitive moral development, highlighting moral reasoning research relevant to the business ethics domain. Implications for future business ethics research, higher education and training, and the management of ethical/unethical behavior are discussed.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:31:27 | 显示全部楼层
Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-Blowing,ower relationships to propose a model of the whistle-blowing process. This model focuses on decisions made by organization members who believe they have evidence of organizational wrongdoing, and the reactions of organization authorities. Based on a review of the sparse empirical literature, we sugg
发表于 2025-3-22 21:32:27 | 显示全部楼层
The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research,as an item characteristic (perceived desirability of the behavior) on self-reported ethical conduct. Findings from a sample of college students revealed that self-reported ethical conduct is associated with both personality and item characteristics, with perceived desirability of behavior having the
发表于 2025-3-23 04:40:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:11:01 | 显示全部楼层
,A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003,blished in top business journals during this period. Tables are included that summarize the findings by dependent variable – awareness, judgment, intent, and behavior. We compare this review with past reviews in order to draw conclusions regarding trends in the ethical decision-making literature and
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-30 19:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表