Titlebook: Choreographing Problems; Expressive Concepts Bojana Cvejić Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2015 Performance phil

契约

书目名称Choreographing Problems影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Choreographing Problems影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Choreographing Problems网络公开度




书目名称Choreographing Problems网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Choreographing Problems被引频次




书目名称Choreographing Problems被引频次学科排名




书目名称Choreographing Problems年度引用




书目名称Choreographing Problems年度引用学科排名




书目名称Choreographing Problems读者反馈




书目名称Choreographing Problems读者反馈学科排名

亲属

Book 2015This book illuminates the relationship between philosophy and experimental choreographic practice today in the works of leading European choreographers. A discussion of key issues in contemporary performance from the viewpoint of Deleuze, Spinoza and Bergson is accompanied by intricate analyses of seven groundbreaking dance performances.  

转换

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437396Performance philosophy; contemporary performance; choreography; Baruch de Spinoza; bibliography; body; con

Gratulate

Campaign

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96666-8 kind of thought that they both arise from and give rise to. It is an attempt to account, under the philosophical theme of “problems,” for the thought that differentiates specific practices of making, performing, and attending in seven works of dance. . and . by Xavier Le Roy, . by Jonathan Burrows

浪荡子

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97113-5es or formulates a “problem,” and the thorough interpretation of each work requires a distinctive kind of conceptual practice to which that problem gives rise. My claim is based on the study of three varieties of sources: firstly, I draw on the documentation of all seven works’ creation process, on

浪荡子

偶然

Platon und das Muster des Staates,West European and North American) tradition within which the choreographies considered here are made and presented. The attribute of “theater” means more than an institutional distinction from nonartistic dance practices such as social dancing or traditional folkloric dance. Since its modern profess

galley

Kees Schuyt,Kees Groenendijk,Bernard Slootlosophy and dance criticism and at once an important question raised by the concept of “choreographing problems”: can dancing be equated with thinking, and if so, under which conditions and terms? The topic of the relationship between dance and thought is further complicated by claims related to imp

Priapism

Die schwedische Rechtshilfereform,en the body and movement and between performing and attending. There I discussed concepts such as “part-bodies” and “part-machines” as well as theatrical apparatuses of disjunction such as the “head-box,” “de-figurement” of the stage, and heterogeneous “assemblings” (wirings of bodies and things). I